Keywords
farming
knowledge
PalayCheck
programs
rice
technology
How to Cite
Abstract
Inflation in the Philippines has negatively affected agriculture by causing price fluctuations and challenging the adoption of technology. One program from the national government that refines rice production is the Sistemang PalayCheck. A communal technology-based program that empowers farmers to enhance their understanding and expertise in rice cultivation, fostering a shared learning environment. This study evaluates the impact of Sistemang PalayCheck among farmers in the City of Malolos, Bulacan, focusing on knowledge acquisition, skill improvement, and attitude enhancement. This study employed a purposive sampling technique, focusing on 100 farmers who were intentionally selected for their relevance to the research—particularly those with no prior knowledge of the Sistemang PalayCheck program. The instrument used is a 22-item Likert scale questionnaire designed to measure the delivery of Sistemang PalayCheck among the farmers. It covered three domains: knowledge, skill, and attitude. Findings revealed that farmers achieved high levels of knowledge (M = 3.90, SD = 0.31), skill (M = 3.90, SD = 0.36), and attitude (M = 3.83, SD = 0.36), indicating the program's effectiveness in enhancing farming practices. The implications suggest that community-based agricultural interventions can significantly contribute to food security and sustainable economic growth.
References
Ain, N., Hakim, L., Pairan, M., & Zakaria, M. (2025). Step-by-step guide to calculating content validity index (CVI) for single constructs using excel. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3), 1717–1726. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90300135
Briones, R. M. (2021). Philippine agriculture: Current state, challenges, and ways forward (Policy Note No. 2021-12). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/pn2021.12
Briones, R. M., Galang, I. M. R., & Latigar, J. S. (2023). Transforming Philippine agri-food systems with digital technology: Extent, prospects, and inclusiveness. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2023.29
Cayabyab, B., Serrano, E., Quimbo, M., & Calalo, F. (2024). Effectiveness of application of knowledge of agricultural training among farmer-scientist training participants in the Philippines. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 28(3), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v28i3.12
Department of Agriculture. (2023). National agricultural development plan 2023–2028. https://pdp.depdev.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023/jones01/PDP-2023-2028.pdf
Etikan, I., Musa, S. I., & Alkassim, R. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2007). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill. https://www.academia.edu/33649219/HOW_TO_DESIGN_AND_EVALUATE_RESEARCH_IN_EDUCATION_by_Fraenkell_Wallen
Inutan, S. M. B., Dujali, I. L., Bacus, M. S., Quijano-Pagutayao, A. S., & Sarita, V. B. (2025). The role of agricultural extension in farmers’ technology adoption for sustainable agricultural practices in Davao Oriental, Philippines. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 10(4), 342–354. https://doi.org/10.51584/ijrias.2025.10040028
Jones-Garcia, E., & Krishna, V. V. (2021). Farmer adoption of sustainable intensification technologies in the maize systems of the Global South: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00658-9
Kliem, L. (2022). Strengthening agroecological resilience through commons-based seed governance in the Philippines. Environment Development and Sustainability, 26(2), 5367–5399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02844-z
Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). What is purposive sampling? Definition & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/
Ocampo, K. (2018). PIDS: PH agri revolutions behind in terms of tech. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://www.pids.gov.ph/details/pids-ph-agri-revolutions-behind-in-terms-of-tech
Okori, P., Munthali, W., Msere, H., Charlie, H., Chitaya, S., Sichali, F., Chilumpha, E., Chirwa, T., Seetha, A., Chinyamuyamu, B., Monyo, E., Siambi, M., & Chirwa, R. (2022). Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: Experiences from Malawi. Agriculture & Food Security, 11(1), Article 375. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00375-4
Philippine Rice Research Institute & Department of Agriculture. (2022). PalayCheck system for irrigated lowland rice: 2022 revised edition [PDF]. Department of Agriculture-PhilRice. https://www.philrice.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/PalayCheck-System-2022-Revised-Edition.pdf
Red, F. S., Amestoso, N. T., & Casinillo, L. F. (2021). Effect of farmer field school (FFS) on the knowledge, attitude, practices, and profitability of rice farmers. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(4), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v4i4.420
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Southeast Asian Journal of Agriculture and Allied Sciences