Abstract
The ability to read fluently and effectively is one of the keys to opening doors to educational success. Although the importance of fluent reading has been taught to learners at school, there are still many students who are having difficulty reading fluently. To address the problem stated, researchers of this study used four (4) researcher-made localized materials, which are repeatedly taught. This study utilized the multiphase mixed method research design to determine the effect of the intervention program on the reading fluency of the students. It was conducted to determine the struggling readers of 11th-grade HUMSS students at John J. Russell Memorial High School. The researchers conducted pre-assessment reading and determined 35 readers who subsequently served as the participants. After the intervention program, it was observed that the participants attained higher Word Correct Per Minute (WCPM) in their post-test. The pre-test recorded mean score was 116.97 WCPM, while the post-test recorded mean was 139.66 WCPM. The p-value of the data set is (p < 0.001), which denotes that the difference between the results of the pretest and posttest is highly significant. This was also further strengthened by the feedback obtained from the students through a guided interview. Based on the participants’ statements, repeated reading of researcher-made localized materials has improved their reading speed and their reading accuracy.
References
Alotaibi, K. S. (2022). Using repeated reading and previewing vocabulary interventions with elementary-aged struggling readers to improve fluency and comprehension. https://doi.org/10.25777/efze-1z02
Anderson, J. (2017). The use of the initial teaching alphabet (I.t.a.) for acquisition of English phonology, vocabulary, grammar, reading, and writing by speakers of other languages. EDULEARN17 proceedings, 1419-1425. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.1304
Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate. Journal of memory and language, 109, 104047. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xynwg
Busso, M., Dinkelman, T., Martínez, A. C., & Romero, D. (2017). The effects of financial aid and returns information in selective and less selective schools: Experimental evidence from Chile. Labour Economics, 45, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2016.11.001
Caraig, R., & Quimbo, M. A. (2022). Assessing reading comprehension difficulties in core science subjects of senior high school students in a private school in Calamba City, Philippines: Assessing reading comprehension difficulties. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(3), 1983-2010
Carver, M., Todd, C., & Bubp, M. (2017). All repeated reading fluency strategies are not created equal. INTED proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.1424
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. http://www.ceil-conicet.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CRESWELLQualitative-Inquary-and-Research-Design-Creswell.pdf
Conolly, J., & Westwood, E. (2021). ARTIST | Surgeon: ‘You were my best work’. Seconds, 45-60. https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781800859289.003.0004
De Rycker, A. (2014). Encouraging collocational and colligational fluency: pedagogical chunking, word and verb mapping, pause reading and other strategies. Journal for Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE), 1-16(1). https://doi.org/10.7603/s40933-014-0002-4
Deeney, T. A., & Shim, M. K. (2016). Teachers’ and students’ views of reading fluency: Issues of consequential validity in adopting one-minute reading fluency assessments. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 41(2), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508415619905
Driggs, C. (2013). The efficacy of repeated reading on secondary students' oral reading fluency and retell fluency. https://doi.org/10.15385/tmed.2013.4
Henriksen, E. K. (2021). Designing learning resources and investigating student motivation and learning in general relativity and quantum physics in Norway. Teaching Einsteinian Physics in Schools, 309-318. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161721-24
Hussein, S. M. (2020). The correlation between error correction and grammar accuracy in second language writing. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 2980-2990. https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i5/pr202003
Jacob, R. (2017). Reading partners evaluation. AEA Randomized Controlled Trials. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.1908-2.0
Lee, J. (2018). Relationship between vocabulary size, syntactic awareness and reading comprehension in low- and high-level Korean high school EFL students. Secondary English Education, 11(3), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.20487/kasee.11.3.201808.3
Moskal, M. J. (2022). CORR insights®: What are the minimally important changes of four commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for 36 hand and wrist condition-treatment combinations? Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 480(6), 1167-1169. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000002138
OECD (2016), Low-Performing Students: Why They Fall Behind and How to Help Them Succeed, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264250246-en.
Rafael, S. D., & Tamban, V. E. (2022). Effectiveness of localized English reading materials in enhancing the reading skills of the grade two pupils. Journal of English as A Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.31098/jefltr.v2i2.1126
Saquido, J. K., & Velasco, C. (2024). Aligned local reading materials and the literacy comprehension level of grade 7 students. Pedagogy Review: An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies, 3(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.3.1.sc-0624-025
Sukhram, D., & Ellen Monda-Amaya, L. (2017). The effects of oral repeated reading with and without corrective feedback on middle school struggling readers. British Journal of Special Education, 44(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12162
Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). What oral text reading fluency can reveal about reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12024
Zavala, E., & Cuevas, J. (2019). Effects of repeated reading and rhyming poetry on reading fluency. International Jornal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 6(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v6i2p64

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Southeast Asian Journal of Agriculture and Allied Sciences